6 min read

Why I'm Investing in Silver Before Bitcoin

I went to a crypto conference in Miami and came back thinking about silver.
Why I'm Investing in Silver Before Bitcoin
Silver could be a better investment than Gold and Bitcoin

I went to a crypto conference in Miami and came back thinking about silver.

That was not the plan.

A friend from my Hampton group mentioned he was considering attending a gathering put together by Real Vision - a community and training programme run by Raoul Pal. I had been seeing Raoul's videos pop up on YouTube for years while researching Bitcoin. Long videos, but insightful commentary. I would put them on during workouts. When I learned he was behind this conference, I thought it was worth attending.

Miami was also somewhere I had wanted to visit for a long time. I had heard it was full of Latin culture, similar to Cuba - which I loved when I visited. When I arrived, everyone was speaking Spanish to me. It felt familiar in an unexpected way.

The conference ran for three days. Thursday afternoon through Saturday. Talks throughout about what is happening in the markets - crypto, macro trends, where things are heading.

I walked in interested in Bitcoin and alt-coins. I walked out thinking I need to invest in silver.

What I Expected to Hear

The conference started with what Raoul called the "drinks with Raoul Pal" session. He spoke about the state of crypto, interviewed people, discussed why alt-coins have underperformed this cycle.

The consensus was clear: Bitcoin is going up long-term. I believe that too. It is a store of value with limited supply. A hedge against inflation. The fact that it has no functionality beyond being a store of value used to concern me slightly - but then again, what functionality does gold have other than people wearing it around their necks?

But here is what caught my attention. Alt-coins have not had their peak this cycle. The money that normally flows from Bitcoin into alt-coins went somewhere else - into precious metals and tech stocks. That is unusual. Previous cycles saw that rotation happen like clockwork.

This year, Bitcoin peaked, crashed back to around $80,000, recovered to $90,000 - roughly where it started the year. The explosive alt-coin season everyone expected never arrived.

The question became: where did that money go instead?

The Silver Thesis

The biggest takeaway from the conference was not about crypto at all. It was about silver.

The argument is straightforward: the technologies shaping our future - solar energy, electric vehicles, artificial intelligence, 5G networks - all require silver. Not as a nice-to-have, but as an essential component. And supply cannot keep up with demand.

Let me break this down in terms that made sense to me as someone who builds software, not someone who trades commodities.

The Supply Problem

Silver has been in deficit for five consecutive years. More silver is being consumed than produced. The total shortfall from 2021 to 2025 is approximately 820 million ounces - roughly equivalent to an entire year of global mine production.

Here is why this cannot be easily fixed:

Seventy percent of silver production is a byproduct. Silver mostly comes out of the ground alongside copper, lead, and zinc. Mining companies make decisions based on those metals, not silver. Even if silver prices double, copper mine operators do not suddenly produce more silver. It is like trying to increase your website's database capacity by buying more office chairs - the two are connected operationally but not causally.

New mines take seven to ten years to develop. From discovery to commercial production, assuming everything goes smoothly with regulations and financing. There is no quick fix. You cannot spin up silver production the way you would spin up more cloud servers.

Ore grades are declining. The easy silver has already been extracted. Mining companies now process larger volumes of rock to get the same amount of metal. Costs rise. Marginal deposits become uneconomical.

The Demand Explosion

Industrial demand reached a record 680 million ounces in 2024. That was the fourth consecutive annual high. And it is accelerating.

Solar panels consume approximately 197 million ounces annually. Each panel needs 15-20 grams of silver in conductive paste. Global installed solar capacity is projected to more than triple by 2030 - from 2.2 terawatts to over 7 terawatts. The maths is simple: more panels, more silver.

Electric vehicles use 25-50 grams of silver per car - roughly double what traditional vehicles require. Battery management systems, power electronics, sensors. EV adoption is still in early stages globally.

AI infrastructure requires data centres with 2-3 times the silver content of traditional facilities. Higher power density, more complex cooling, more interconnections. Every percentage point of growth in computing demand translates to more silver.

Your smartphone contains 200-300 milligrams of silver. A laptop has 750 milligrams. Billions of devices manufactured annually, each containing small amounts that add up to significant demand.

The critical point: silver represents such a small fraction of the total cost of these products - typically 0.5-2% of a solar panel, for example - that manufacturers will pay whatever it takes to secure supply. A doubling in silver price barely moves the needle on installed system cost. This is price inelasticity. Demand does not decrease meaningfully even when prices rise.

Why Not Gold or Bitcoin?

Gold is a store of value. Central banks buy it. Investors hold it during uncertainty. But gold lacks the industrial demand driver that silver has. There is no exponential growth curve for gold consumption tied to technological transformation.

Bitcoin is speculative. I believe in it long-term as a store of value, but it has no physical utility. Its value rests entirely on network effects and adoption - reflexive dynamics where price appreciation attracts capital which drives further appreciation. That is a different kind of bet.

Silver sits at the intersection: a store of value with monetary history, plus irreplaceable industrial applications in the technologies defining our future. That combination is what makes the thesis compelling.

The Honest Counterargument

I would not be giving you the full picture without addressing substitution. This is where I spent additional time researching after the conference, because the bullish case seemed almost too clean.

Copper is already replacing silver in solar cells. China's Longi, the world's largest solar manufacturer, announced plans to mass-produce copper-metallised cells in 2026. Copper-based paste can reduce silver content by 50-90% while maintaining performance. Australian researchers have developed copper plating with protective silver or tin caps that prevents the oxidation problems that previously made copper unreliable.

Carbon-based materials are emerging in electronics. Graphene can carry nearly 1,000 times more current than copper. Carbon nanotube films are already manufactured at scale. Conductive polymers combined with minimal metal content achieve comparable performance for certain applications.

Thrifting works. Between the 1990s and 2017, the electronics industry reduced silver content in capacitors from 7 million ounces annually to 0.5 million ounces - a 93% reduction - while device production exploded. Engineers find solutions when economic incentives align.

This creates what I think of as a ceiling on silver prices. Above $75-100 per ounce sustained, substitution accelerates dramatically. Manufacturers who were content to pay silver premiums suddenly have compelling economic reasons to switch. Research programmes get funded. Alternative materials reach commercial scale faster.

The realistic view, incorporating substitution pressure: silver likely appreciates 2-4x from current levels over the next five years. Not the 10-15x scenarios some bulls project. Those projections require assuming substitution is impossible - and the evidence suggests it is merely difficult and time-consuming.

My Position

I attended this conference without any interest in precious metals. I was there for crypto insights. I left thinking silver deserves a place in my portfolio before additional Bitcoin or gold.

The thesis is not about getting rich quickly. It is about a structural supply-demand imbalance that takes years to resolve. New mines cannot be developed fast enough. Substitution is real but slow. Industrial demand is locked in by technology adoption curves that are already in motion.

I am not a financial advisor. This is what I learned, what I found compelling, and what I am personally considering. Do your own research. Understand the risks.

But if you are looking at where to allocate capital for the next five to ten years, and you care about tangible assets with genuine utility in the technologies shaping our future - silver is worth understanding.

I went to Miami for a crypto conference. I came back thinking about the metal inside every solar panel, every electric vehicle, every smartphone, every data centre powering the AI applications we are all building toward.

Sometimes the most valuable insights come from where you least expect them.


I have put together a simplified research document covering the silver investment thesis - the supply constraints, demand drivers, substitution risks, and key data points. If you want to understand this deeper, you can download it free at axelmolist.com/silver-cheat-sheet.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Become a subscriber receive the latest updates in your inbox.